Does Section 37 require perfect performance, or is substantial performance enough?

Section 37 requires either performance or an offer to perform the promise. Indian courts recognize the doctrine of substantial performance in most contracts: if you substantially perform your obligations and any breach is minor or inadvertent, the other party cannot reject your performance. However, for contracts requiring strict or exact performance (like payment of a specific sum), substantial performance may not suffice. Your contract should clarify the standard of performance expected.

If performance becomes impossible after the contract is signed, am I still liable?

No. Section 37 allows performance to be excused when it becomes impossible due to supervening events beyond your control (e.g., the subject matter is destroyed, it becomes illegal, or performance is prevented by an act of God). However, you must prove the impossibility was genuinely unforeseen and not caused by your own breach or negligence. Rising costs, market changes, or business difficulties do not count as impossibility.

How should I draft a force majeure clause to align with Section 37?

Your force majeure clause should list specific events (pandemic, war, earthquake, government action) that excuse performance under Section 37's excuse framework. Specify the notice period and steps the affected party must take to mitigate harm. Make clear whether the clause suspends performance temporarily or terminates the contract if the event persists beyond a set period. Without this clarity, courts will interpret ambiguities narrowly and may not excuse performance.

Can I use Section 37 to argue I do not have to perform because the other party breached first?

Not automatically. Section 37 establishes the core obligation; it does not excuse breach by one party because the other party breached. However, your contract can include conditions that allow you to withhold performance if the other party breaches first (called a 'condition concurrent' or 'dependent covenant'). Additionally, Indian law recognizes the doctrine of material breach: if the other party commits a material breach, you may have the right to terminate and refuse further performance. Draft these conditions explicitly to avoid disputes.

Section 37 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872: Obligation of parties to contracts

Section 37 Indian Contract Act: parties must perform promises unless excused by law. Impact on drafting, force majeure, conditions, and breach remedies.

The provision

The parties to a contract must either perform, or offer to perform, their respective promises, unless such performance is dispensed with or excused under the provisions of this Act, or of any other law.

Indian Contract Act, 1872, Section 37. Official text.

What Section 37 Means

Section 37 of the Indian Contract Act establishes a core principle: once you enter into a contract, you have a legal obligation to perform your promises. This applies to all parties equally. Performance means actually doing what you promised (or offering to do it if the other party prevents or delays acceptance). This obligation is automatic and binding unless the Act itself or another law allows you to be excused from performing.

When You Are Excused from Performance

The section acknowledges that performance can be dispensed with or excused in specific situations. The Act itself provides several such exceptions, including impossibility (when performance becomes impossible due to unforeseen events), supervening illegality (when performance becomes illegal after the contract is formed), and frustration of purpose (when circumstances change so drastically that the contract's objective cannot be achieved). Other statutes may also provide excuses. However, mere hardship, inconvenience, or cost increases do not excuse performance; you must still perform unless one of these recognized legal grounds applies.

Contract Drafting and Negotiation Implications

When drafting contracts governed by Indian law, recognizing Section 37's strict performance obligation is critical. First, be explicit about what constitutes acceptable performance. Vague or ambiguous terms invite disputes and will be interpreted against the drafter under Indian contract law. Define deliverables, timelines, quality standards, and acceptance criteria clearly.

Second, anticipate excuse scenarios in your force majeure and hardship clauses. Since Section 37 allows excuses only under the Act or other law, your contract should spell out which events qualify as performance excuses specific to your deal. Standard force majeure language (covering pandemics, war, natural disasters) is essential but should reference the contract's purpose to strengthen frustration claims if needed.

Third, consider performance conditions carefully. Use conditions precedent and conditions subsequent to clarify when obligations arise and when they are satisfied. If performance is conditional, draft those conditions explicitly; do not rely on courts to imply them.

Fourth, address partial performance scenarios. If partial performance is valuable, say so. If all-or-nothing performance is required, state it. This prevents disputes about whether offering partial performance satisfies the obligation under Section 37.

Finally, in negotiation, watch for asymmetric performance obligations. Both parties should have equally defined, measurable obligations. Unequal or undefined obligations invite breach claims and litigation. Indemnification clauses should protect you if the other party fails to perform, but the clause cannot override the fundamental obligation created by Section 37.

Practical Enforcement

If the other party fails to perform, you have remedies: specific performance (court compels the other party to perform), damages (compensation for your losses), or termination of the contract. The choice depends on the contract terms and whether the breach is material. Section 37 underpins all these remedies; without it, there would be no enforceable obligation.

This page explains the law in general terms for information only. It is not legal advice. Always read the provision in its official source and take advice on your specific facts.

Frequently asked questions

Does Section 37 require perfect performance, or is substantial performance enough?: Section 37 requires either performance or an offer to perform the promise. Indian courts recognize the doctrine of substantial performance in most contracts: if you substantially perform your obligations and any breach is minor or inadvertent, the other party cannot reject your performance. However, for contracts requiring strict or exact performance (like payment of a specific sum), substantial performance may not suffice. Your contract should clarify the standard of performance expected.
If performance becomes impossible after the contract is signed, am I still liable?: No. Section 37 allows performance to be excused when it becomes impossible due to supervening events beyond your control (e.g., the subject matter is destroyed, it becomes illegal, or performance is prevented by an act of God). However, you must prove the impossibility was genuinely unforeseen and not caused by your own breach or negligence. Rising costs, market changes, or business difficulties do not count as impossibility.
How should I draft a force majeure clause to align with Section 37?: Your force majeure clause should list specific events (pandemic, war, earthquake, government action) that excuse performance under Section 37's excuse framework. Specify the notice period and steps the affected party must take to mitigate harm. Make clear whether the clause suspends performance temporarily or terminates the contract if the event persists beyond a set period. Without this clarity, courts will interpret ambiguities narrowly and may not excuse performance.
Can I use Section 37 to argue I do not have to perform because the other party breached first?: Not automatically. Section 37 establishes the core obligation; it does not excuse breach by one party because the other party breached. However, your contract can include conditions that allow you to withhold performance if the other party breaches first (called a 'condition concurrent' or 'dependent covenant'). Additionally, Indian law recognizes the doctrine of material breach: if the other party commits a material breach, you may have the right to terminate and refuse further performance. Draft these conditions explicitly to avoid disputes.

Related in the library

Adira drafts and reviews contracts under the law of the jurisdiction they work in.

See Adira