clm

Best Sertifi Alternative for Law Firms in Singapore (2026)

Adira EditorialLegal AI desk5 min read

Sertifi is a solid platform for agreements and payments. It pairs e-signatures with payment authorisations and secure collection, which suits client-facing sign-offs and engagement deposits. For a law firm in Singapore, that covers the front door but not the practice. A firm’s contract work is drafting, marking up, negotiating and running due diligence across many matters and clients, at a depth and speed that signing and payment tools are not designed for. So most firms that use Sertifi for client agreements still need a drafting and review system for the legal work itself. Here is an honest shortlist for firms. ## Where Sertifi fits, and where a firm needs more Sertifi is good at what it does. The payment-plus-signature flow is genuinely useful for engagement letters and client payments, and the security around that flow is a real strength. The limit for a firm is depth. Generating a long agreement from a brief, editing clauses precisely across versions, comparing redlines, and reviewing a data room at volume are the daily jobs of practice, and they sit well outside Sertifi’s scope. This is about purpose, not quality. ## A fair shortlist for law firms in Singapore Choose on matter mix, volume and how much AI drafting and review you want. - ContractPodAi. Enterprise legal AI with broad workflow. Best for a larger firm or legal department that wants one deeply configured system.

  • Agiloft. Highly configurable no-code CLM. Best for a firm with specific processes and the appetite to configure, though the rollout is a project.
  • SpotDraft. Workflow-led CLM with an APAC footprint. Best for a firm that wants automation shaped around regional practice.
  • LinkSquares. Repository and AI analytics. Best when the priority is organising and reporting on a large contract base.
  • Juro. A lean, in-browser workspace. Best for a small firm that wants fast drafting and a clean repository.
  • Adira. An AI-native drafting and review workspace, covered below. For many Singapore firms, ContractPodAi and Agiloft suit deep configuration, SpotDraft suits regional workflow, LinkSquares suits repository needs, and Juro suits lean practices. ## What a law firm in Singapore needs Practice work is drafting and review at depth. Good looks like this. Drafting full, execution-ready agreements from a brief, not just filling a template. Clause-level editing in plain language, with a diff and clause dependencies shown. Document intelligence that marks each position favourable, neutral or unfavourable and flags vulnerabilities and missing clauses. Fast due-diligence review across many documents. A reliable repository and version history per matter. E-signing that meets the Electronic Transactions Act 2010. And client-data discipline under the PDPA, with role-based access and encryption. Sertifi covers client signing and payment, but a firm should weigh the drafting, review and diligence jobs it does not. ## Where Adira fits for a law firm in Singapore Adira is an AI legal operating system built on Anthropic's Claude, with drafting, review, tracking and governance in one workspace. For a firm, the relevant parts are its drafting and review depth. The AI Drafting Studio generates complete, structured agreements from a brief. A firm-tuned persona, built from the firm’s own documents, keeps drafts in house style. Each contract is a structured clause tree, so edits are precise and reversible and dependencies are visible. Document intelligence colour-codes clause risk and flags vulnerabilities, key dates and missing clauses. Pricing is public: Practice at US$89 per seat per month billed annually and Firm at US$179 per seat per month billed annually, Enterprise custom, with a 7-day free trial; the USD figures convert to roughly the Singapore-dollar equivalent, with local billing to confirm in a trial. Adira does not train on your contract corpus, and Enterprise adds single sign-on, SAML and audit logs. On results, Adira reports its own measured figures: across 18 law firms using it, contract review and due diligence that took 10 to 12 days fell to under 2 hours, with only 2 to 3 rechecks needed in total. These are Adira’s own numbers from live deployments, not an independent study, so treat them as a vendor benchmark and test them on real matters in the trial. Be fair about the caveats. Adira is India-first and global-capable, so a Singapore firm should verify local-jurisdiction depth, Singapore drafting conventions and review quality during the trial. Adira is a challenger here, not the category leader, and a large firm with complex, bespoke workflows may find a configurable incumbent such as Agiloft or ContractPodAi a better fit. ## Where signing and payments still fit a firm Even after a firm adopts a drafting and review tool, a signing and payment platform can still earn a place at the front of the engagement. Sertifi-style flows suit engagement letters, retainers and client deposits, where taking a signature and a payment together is genuinely useful. The practice work, drafting, redlining and due diligence, belongs in a tool built for depth. Keep the line clear: client onboarding and payment in one system, matter contract work in another, and client confidentiality governed under the PDPA across both. Agree how a signed engagement letter is filed, who can see client-payment data, and how matter documents stay separated by client. A firm that keeps these responsibilities distinct avoids mixing billing data with privileged matter files and keeps each tool doing the job it is good at. ## How to choose Shortlist two or three. If you need deep configuration, trial Agiloft or ContractPodAi. If you want regional workflow, trial SpotDraft. If you want AI-native drafting and review with visible pricing, trial Adira next to one incumbent. Run the same matters through each, time the drafting and the diligence review, count the rechecks, and keep the tool that saves the most hours while meeting your PDPA and client-confidentiality duties. This is general information, not legal advice. Confirm jurisdiction-specific requirements with qualified counsel. You can see the full feature set and current pricing at Adira.

Frequently asked questions

Why is Sertifi not built for law firm contract work?
Sertifi focuses on e-signatures, payment authorisations and collection, which suits engagement letters and client payments. A firm\u2019s core contract work is drafting, clause-level editing, redlining and due diligence across matters, which Sertifi is not designed for. Most firms use a dedicated drafting and review system for the legal work and keep Sertifi, if at all, for client signing and payment.
What are good alternatives to Sertifi for Singapore law firms?
ContractPodAi and Agiloft suit deep configuration, SpotDraft brings regional workflow automation, LinkSquares is strong on repository and analytics, and Juro suits lean firms. Adira is an AI-native drafting and review option with public per-seat pricing and clause-level document intelligence.
What does Adira\u2019s benchmark show for firms?
Across 18 law firms using Adira, contract review and due diligence fell from 10 to 12 days to under 2 hours, with only 2 to 3 rechecks in total. These are Adira\u2019s own measured results from live deployments, not an independent study, so test them on real matters during the 7-day trial.
Can Adira handle Singapore matters?
Adira is India-first and global-capable, built on Anthropic\u2019s Claude, and does not train on your contract corpus. A Singapore firm should verify local-jurisdiction depth, drafting conventions, electronic signing under the Electronic Transactions Act 2010 and PDPA client-data handling during the trial before relying on it for local matters.
Was this useful?

See how Adira drafts in your voice and reads contracts from your side.

Explore the showroom

Working through a contract like this? Weave is Adira’s free tool to read, mark up, and connect any contract in your browser — no account needed.

Try Weave — free