Adira Pricing: Plans and What's Included

Adira has three plans. Practice costs $89 per seat per month annually, or $109 monthly, with a 3-seat minimum. Firm costs $179 per seat per month annually, or $219 monthly, with a 5-seat minimum. Enterprise is custom, quoted after a call. There is a 7-day free trial. Those numbers are published on adiralaw.com; this page was last verified against that page in September 2026, and pricing on a live SaaS product changes, so confirm current figures on adiralaw.com before you budget against them.

Adira, which publishes this page, sells this software, so we have an obvious interest in how you read these numbers. This guide states the real, published pricing rather than a marketing range, flags any unconfirmed detail rather than guessing, and is written to help you evaluate any CLM vendor's pricing, not just ours.

What the three plans actually cost

Plan	Annual billing	Monthly billing	Minimum seats	Who it is built for
Practice	$89/seat/month	$109/seat/month	3	Solo practitioners and small firms or in-house teams
Firm	$179/seat/month	$219/seat/month	5	Mid-size firms and legal teams with more volume and more approvers
Enterprise	Custom	Custom	Confirm on adiralaw.com	Large organisations needing custom terms, integrations, or scale

Two things stand out. First, paying annually is meaningfully cheaper on both plans, not a token discount: $89 versus $109 on Practice, $179 versus $219 on Firm, roughly 22 percent more if you pay monthly. Second, the seat minimums are floors, not caps. Nothing in the published structure forces a 4 or 6-seat team on Practice up to Firm; that only makes sense once you actually need what Firm adds. If your team sits near a boundary, confirm on adiralaw.com whether Practice has any seat ceiling before assuming you can grow on it indefinitely.

What each plan includes, and what to confirm before you sign

Every Adira plan shares the same core workflow: an AI drafting studio, clause-level editing on a structured clause tree rather than a flat document, document intelligence that flags favourable, neutral, and unfavourable positions plus red flags, a searchable repository, obligation and renewal tracking, e-signing and e-stamping, and export. That baseline is what makes Practice usable for a solo practitioner or a three-person team from day one, not a stripped demo.

What plausibly changes up the tiers is depth and scale, not whether a feature exists at all: how much of your own document corpus you can train Company Persona (Adira's house-style drafting feature) on, how many approval workflows and roles you can configure, how much priority support you get, and at Enterprise, custom integrations, data residency terms, and dedicated account handling. Adira has not published a line-by-line feature-to-tier matrix as of this writing, so treat specifics here as directional. If a particular feature is the reason you are buying a tier, confirm it is actually included there on adiralaw.com or with sales before you sign, not after.

A worked example: what a 3-seat Practice team actually pays

Take the smallest team the pricing allows: three seats on Practice, billed annually.

• Monthly cost: 3 seats x $89 = $267/month
• Annual cost: $267 x 12 = $3,204/year

If that same three-person team instead paid month to month:

• Monthly cost: 3 seats x $109 = $327/month
• Annual cost: $327 x 12 = $3,924/year

Committing to the annual plan saves this team $720 a year, about 18.3 percent, for the same purchase with a longer commitment. Scale the arithmetic to a 5-seat Firm team and the annual-versus-monthly gap is $2,400 a year ($10,740 versus $13,140), the same roughly 22 percent premium for staying month to month.

One India-specific line item most vendor comparison pages skip: if Adira invoices you from outside India, subscribing is an import of service, and under Section 5(3) of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, a GST-registered Indian recipient of an imported service generally self-assesses and pays IGST under reverse charge, commonly at 18 percent, rather than the foreign supplier charging it. In practice the buyer pays the subscription fee, separately self-invoices and remits IGST, and can usually claim input tax credit if the subscription is for business use. Build this into total cost of ownership, and confirm the invoicing entity and tax treatment with Adira's billing team.

The Indian position: why a determinable price is not a minor detail

A price is not a footnote to a contract; in Indian law it is part of what makes a contract enforceable at all. Section 29 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 states plainly:

"Agreements, the meaning of which is not certain, or capable of being made certain, are void."

Source: Section 29, Indian Contract Act, 1872

The section's own illustrations are unusually direct about price. Illustration (f) gives an agreement to sell "my white horse for rupees five hundred or rupees one thousand" with nothing to show which price applies, and calls it void for uncertainty. Illustration (e), by contrast, gives an agreement to sell rice "at a price to be fixed by C" and holds it valid, because the price, though not a stated number, is capable of being made certain by a defined mechanism. That is the exact line a "contact us for pricing" CLM vendor sits on. A published number, like Adira's $89 or $179 per seat, is Illustration (e) done the easy way: certain on its face. An undefined sales conversation with no stated formula sits closer to Illustration (f) if the eventual number bears no relationship to anything you were told in advance.

This matters most at renewal, not signing. A standard-form SaaS agreement, one you did not negotiate line by line, is the kind of contract the Supreme Court examined in LIC of India v Consumer Education & Research Centre, (1995) 5 SCC 482 (10 May 1995). The Court held that in a standard-form contract where one party has no real power to negotiate, only to take it or leave it, courts can and should scrutinise terms that are one-sided or unconscionable, where bargaining power is unequal. See the full judgment on Indian Kanoon. That case turned on a state insurer's policy and was decided on constitutional grounds, so it is not a direct precedent for every private SaaS order form. But the reasoning it is repeatedly cited for, that "standard form" does not put fairness out of a court's reach, is why a vendor's pricing and renewal terms deserve the same scrutiny as any other clause.

Red flags in CLM and SaaS pricing

Normal	Red flag	Why it matters
Per-seat price published on the vendor's site	"Contact sales for pricing," no number anywhere	No anchor to shortlist vendors or build a budget; every quote is a fresh negotiation
Minimum seat count stated upfront	A minimum, or a platform fee, surfaces only after a demo call	The number you budgeted from the website turns out wrong
Annual and monthly prices both shown, gap visible	Only one billing option shown, or the gap hidden until checkout	You cannot judge what flexibility costs, or whether a "discount" is real
A capped, notice-bound renewal increase in the order form	"Vendor may revise fees at its sole discretion," no cap or notice	You can be renewed into a much higher price with no real exit window
A time-boxed free trial that does not require a card	A "free trial" that silently converts into a paid annual term	You can end up billed for a year you never meant to commit to
Feature-to-tier mapping is published or confirmable	Vague descriptions ("enterprise-grade AI") with no stated tier	You buy a tier assuming a feature is included, then find it is higher up or a paid add-on
Termination and refund terms shown before you sign	"Non-cancellable, non-refundable" buried in a linked policy	You can be locked into a full term even if the tool does not fit
GST/tax treatment for an imported SaaS subscription is addressed	Total silence on who bears GST or IGST	A reverse-charge liability shows up only at invoice reconciliation

A bad renewal-fee clause versus a better one

Bad: "Vendor may modify the Fees payable under this Order Form at any time upon notice to Customer, and Customer's continued use of the Services after such notice constitutes acceptance of the revised Fees. This Order Form shall automatically renew for successive terms unless terminated."

What is wrong: the new fee is never defined, there is no cap or real notice period, and "continued use" as acceptance means silence locks you into whatever number the vendor picks. This is close to Illustration (f)'s two-price horse: the eventual figure could be almost anything, with no mechanism to know it in advance.

Better: "The Fees stated in this Order Form are fixed for the Initial Term. At each renewal, Vendor may increase the Fees by no more than 10% over the prior Term's Fees, on at least 60 days' written notice before the renewal date. If Customer does not agree to the increased Fees, Customer may terminate this Order Form, effective at the end of the then-current Term, by written notice given within 30 days of receiving the increase notice, without further liability. This Order Form renews automatically for 12-month terms unless either party gives at least 30 days' written notice of non-renewal before the renewal date."

What changed and why: the increase now has a stated cap and a defined notice window, so the future price is "capable of being made certain" in the sense Section 29 asks for, and you get a real, time-bound exit if you do not accept the new number, instead of a default that favours only the vendor.

Where pricing terms sit inside the rest of the contract

Pricing rarely stands alone. A renewal clause that lets fees jump without a cap is more dangerous next to an auto-renewal term with a short notice window, since you can miss both the increase and your chance to walk away in the same oversight. It also interacts with true-up terms (does adding a seat mid-term prorate, or wait for renewal) and with what you can take with you on exit, your data, clause library, and obligation history. This is not specific to Adira; it is the same checklist any CLM buyer should run against any vendor's order form. Our buyer's checklist for choosing a CLM covers the fuller list, and our honest review of Adira itself is the right next read if you are evaluating us specifically. If you just want to sanity-check a pricing or renewal clause in a contract you already have, mark it up for free in Weave, Adira's free browser contract tool, before spending anything on either side of the deal.

Published pricing versus the quote-only norm in CLM

Most CLM software, in India and internationally, is sold quote-only. Look at almost any enterprise contract-management vendor's website and the pricing page is a form, not a number. That is not automatically dishonest; a genuinely custom enterprise deal, integrations, data residency, dedicated support, can reasonably need a conversation. But quote-only pricing has a real cost even when the vendor is acting in good faith: you cannot compare vendors like-for-like without spending real sales-cycle time on each one, you cannot budget before you have a number to put against a name, and every deal is negotiated from a position where the vendor knows the figure and you do not. Published pricing, even with Enterprise staying custom, shifts real information to the buyer before the sales conversation starts.

The US and global contrast

The quote-only default is at least as strong in the US and European CLM market as in India, so "call for pricing" is not an Indian-specific problem to import against. Where the legal backdrop genuinely differs is how each system treats an agreement that never nails down a price. Indian law, through Section 29, asks whether the price is certain or capable of being made certain by a stated mechanism; leave it fully open with no formula, and the agreement risks being void. US commercial law is more forgiving here. Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code, governing the sale of goods in most US states, has an "open price term" rule: where parties intend a contract but never fix a price left for later, it defaults to "a reasonable price at the time of delivery," rather than voiding the deal. CLM is a service, not a sale of goods, so this does not apply directly to a CLM order form, but the underlying attitude, gap-fill toward reasonableness rather than void the deal, shows how much more tolerant US doctrine is of an unstated price than Indian doctrine. An Indian buyer has more reason, not less, to insist a vendor's fee and renewal mechanism are written down and determinable, since the fallback here is less forgiving.

FAQ

Is $89 per seat the final price, or does it change after a sales call? $89 per seat per month, billed annually, 3-seat minimum, is the published Practice price as of this page's last verification in September 2026. Enterprise pricing is explicitly custom; Practice and Firm are published rates, not opening offers. Confirm the current number on adiralaw.com, since any live SaaS price can change.

Can I stay on Practice if my team grows past 3 seats? The 3-seat figure reads as a minimum, not a maximum, so a 4 or 5-seat team on Practice appears within the published structure. Confirm on adiralaw.com or with sales whether Practice has any upper seat limit before assuming you can grow on it indefinitely.

Does the published price include GST for an Indian buyer? Not necessarily. If Adira bills you from outside India, the subscription is generally an import of service, and a GST-registered Indian recipient typically self-assesses and pays IGST under reverse charge, commonly at 18 percent, separately from the subscription fee, under Section 5(3) of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. Confirm the invoicing entity and tax treatment with Adira's billing team.

What do I get during the 7-day free trial? Adira offers a 7-day free trial as published on adiralaw.com. The exact feature scope during the trial, whether it mirrors Practice, Firm, or a limited set, is not itemised on the pricing page as of this writing; confirm the scope on adiralaw.com or when you start it.

What drives Enterprise pricing if there is no published number? Custom CLM pricing typically depends on seat count well beyond Firm's range, integration complexity, data residency or security requirements, and the support and onboarding involved. Adira has not published the threshold that moves a deal from Firm to Enterprise; confirm where your needs fall on adiralaw.com.

Is annual billing always the better deal? Financially, yes: annual billing is roughly 18 percent cheaper than month-to-month on both plans. Whether that trade-off suits you depends on how confident you are in the tool before committing for a year, which is what the 7-day trial is for.

This page gets you to the real, published Adira numbers and a general framework, price certainty, renewal caps, and the reverse-charge GST question, for judging any CLM vendor's pricing on its merits. It does not tell you whether Adira, or any specific plan, is right for your team, and it is not a substitute for reading the actual order form and terms of service you are asked to sign, or for a lawyer's or accountant's review of a contract or tax position specific to your business.